When storing the file, the standard operation is to copy the file and delete the original.
#Borg vs duplicacy password
If a username and password is supplied, the same credentials are used for all destinations. On Windows, the path may be a UNC path, and the drive letter may be substituted with an asterisk ( *), eg.: " *:\backup ", which will examine all drive letters. Multiple destinations are separated with a " ". The first existing path that optionally contains the marker file is then used as the destination. Before starting the backup, each folder in the list is checked for existence and optionally the presence of the marker file supplied by -alternate-destination-marker. The primary target path is placed before the list of paths supplied with this option. This option allows multiple targets to be specified. The contents of the file are never examined, only file existence. By ensuring that a certain file exists, it is possible to prevent writing data to an unwanted external drive. This can be used to handle situations where an external drive changes drive letter or mount point. If there are alternate paths specified, this option indicates the name of a marker file that must be present in the folder. This option only works when the -alternate-target-paths option is also specified. This may also be supplied as the environment variable AUTH_USERNAME. The username used to connect to the server. This may also be supplied as the environment variable AUTH_PASSWORD. The password used to connect to the server. You can then also specify the Username and password (if required). \\hostname_or_ip_address\folder\subfolder In order to specify network filesystem that is not mounted into your local filesystem click on Manually type path option which allows you to specify the Folder path directly in the following format: You can also connect to network filesystem via SMB/NFS.įile://hostname/folder%20for%20backup file://\\server\folder%20for%20backup (UNC path) "C:\folder for backup" file://c:\folder%20for%20backup (Windows) file:///usr/pub/folder%20for%20backup (Linux) This backend can be used to read and write data to the local file system. Each storage provider has a different URL format which can be used along with the documented options below. When configuring a backup, the storage URL parameter determines which storage provider will be used. You can configure how each storage provider is used with its own set of options. Duplicati supports many storage providers, both standard protocols and a wide range of proprietary cloud storage solutions. This could be a local files or folder, a networked storage device, or a cloud storage provider. Microsoft OneDrive for Business ( API)Ī storage provider is a destination or a target for your backup data. Microsoft OneDrive v2 (Microsoft Graph API) Microsoft SharePoint v2 (Microsoft Graph API) Is that hidden folder a necessity or is it just a temp thing? Because if I lose the drive with the source and that folder is gone, then that defeats the purpose of a backup.Microsoft Office 365 Group (Microsoft Graph API)
![borg vs duplicacy borg vs duplicacy](https://www.borg-pharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/qa002.jpg)
I don't see that on borg, but maybe it's in the system files somewhere. One thing I noticed about duplicacy is that it creates a hidden folder on the source. Borg needs rclone as an extra step, but since both things force me to script the automation stuff, I don't think it should be that much of an impact. Anyhow, what are the pros and cons of borgbackup vs duplicacy? I got both to work.
#Borg vs duplicacy install
I probably needed to get an experimental version, but the install on a headless linux server was a mess and I gave up. Duplicati fit that, but I tried it and it just didn't work. My ideal solution would of had something with a web server GUI and builtin support for automation.
![borg vs duplicacy borg vs duplicacy](https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/zy902zeee7qagph/2021-07-12_ComparativaBackups.png)
The minimum requirements where encryption + deduplication on headless linux server.
#Borg vs duplicacy software
Any reason it shouldn't work? Anyhow, I tried a few backup software solutions and I have settled on either borgbackup + rclone or duplicacy.
![borg vs duplicacy borg vs duplicacy](https://cdn.quotesgram.com/img/6/42/361115722-borg3D_002.jpg)
I have less than 10 GB to backup, so I am planning to use Backblaze B2 for free.